I am trying to tell you that you didn't as I still don't understand it and I'm asking you as a moderator to explain it more in dept to me??
If you did answer my question fully I wouldn't keep on asking things.
So how do you conclude that this is being solved?
As the examples you gave me didn't give an example where player 2 sends away his own troops it only says player 1 nobles player 2 without having co-op but it doesn't explain if its allowed for player 2 to send his troops away.
1. If there is a previous discussion about it, then I would say get screenshots and keep them just in case. DO NOT log into the coop. DO NOT ask that the troops be moved or buildings/walls destroyed. If Player 2 decides to do these things on their own, that's fine. But DO NOT make the request. If Player 2 makes the offer, I suggest you decline so your chances are the same as anyone else's. MAKE SURE you are no longer a coop partner to Player 2 and then noble.
2. If there is no previous discussion about it, then DO NOT log into the coop. Make sure Player 2 is inactive by messaging him. Keep a screenshot of your efforts. Give it at least 3 days (by then he would show yellow or, if he's been gone longer, red). MAKE SURE you are no longer a coop partner to Player 2 and then noble.
I realize this subject came up naturally in this thread, but if you would like to continue discussions about it, please start a thread specifically for it.
I know about bans given in the past where supports explenation to ban is given from what you say now. But the reason for ban is wrong from what we have been told from support earlier
It may have been right at the time. We moderators work with what we know today, not tomorrow.
As I said to sneksinnej... I realize this subject came up naturally in this thread, but if you would like to continue discussions about it, please start a thread specifically for it.
could somebody update us on when the crowns will be awarded for the xmas advent calender competition?
many thanks
hope you have all had a good christmas and new year and best wishes to all for the coming year
Valid question. Please create a thread for this in the appropriate forum.
I do not have an answer for you - that is up to the CM.
So this was the stance on this on June 5th 2016
7. Is internal nobling ok? How should it be done?
Short answer: Yes.
If a player quits the game, it is natural that the tribe would want to take over the villages. Co-op makes this easier, as you can send their troops out of the village first. This if fine, however: you should be fair and split the villages with your tribe mates. Also try to be efficient so you can leave the account alone. Here, again, we are back to the issue that a co-op account should not exist to only benefit one player.
Posted by andy01 (while still a mod), and endorsed by coolnite a couple of posts later in the thread.
So my question is when did this change?
I'm not sure. I can only tell you what I know from today onwards.
As I said to sneksinnej and carrot70... I realize this subject came up naturally in this thread, but if you would like to continue discussions about it, please start a thread specifically for it.
The pushing issue doesn't suddenly disappear just because the co op is no longer applied, kek
True. But then we would have other ways of knowing if it's happening or not. And before you ask - these are trade secrets.