DeletedUser1423
Guest
ADD has hit 70% on this world. Please trigger endgame.
i was with add very early on, once i saw the first merger with SUR, I left the world as I knew it wouldn't be but a few months for it to end. the world has essentially been over since the middle of january, reaching 70% and eventually 80 was just a formalityAndy how did you win a world in 6 months? Was there just very little competition then, if it wasn't achieved through mergers?
It seems very unusual. I think the top player has 300 villages or so? It just screams no competition from the outset to me?
That is pretty much the case. There was 1 merge, like 6 weeks in to the world, and then after that the 9 other tribes in the top 10 declared war, and decided to work together. That didn't go to plan and they just put up no resistance in the case of a typical MRT situation.Andy how did you win a world in 6 months? Was there just very little competition then, if it wasn't achieved through mergers?
It seems very unusual. I think the top player has 300 villages or so? It just screams no competition from the outset to me?
The merge with ADD/SUR was still leaving us with less villages and points than the coalition that were against us, however they just didn't work together or do anything to retort it. They all just gave up. In the end, though it may seem big headed, the more skilled bunch of players won. Not against all odds, but there was definitely enough of a fight to bring to the table, should it have been decided to rally one.i was with add very early on, once i saw the first merger with SUR, I left the world as I knew it wouldn't be but a few months for it to end. the world has essentially been over since the middle of january, reaching 70% and eventually 80 was just a formality
The merge with ADD/SUR was still leaving us with less villages and points than the coalition that were against us, however they just didn't work together or do anything to retort it. They all just gave up. In the end, though it may seem big headed, the more skilled bunch of players won. Not against all odds, but there was definitely enough of a fight to bring to the table, should it have been decided to rally one.
That's not even close to true... The other way around maybe, but there was Roy, SETO, EMR, amongst a few others that were only a little smaller than ourselves, and combined across the board we were outnumbered probably 3:1, just we had better means of communication being in the same tribe, the other tribes were against us, but didn't communicate, and started nobling barbs only. Honestly EMR is one of the only tribes that put up a fight, but in your area you were outnumbered, across the map as a coalition you weren't.That's not true in the slightest and you know it. I think you guys were still 2x as big or maybe even 3x as big as all the tribes in the top 10 combined.
That's not even close to true... The other way around maybe, but there was Roy, SETO, EMR, amongst a few others that were only a little smaller than ourselves, and combined across the board we were outnumbered probably 3:1, just we had better means of communication being in the same tribe, the other tribes were against us, but didn't communicate, and started nobling barbs only. Honestly EMR is one of the only tribes that put up a fight, but in your area you were outnumbered, across the map as a coalition you weren't.
I don't really remember, but I am pretty sure that them details that you have pulled are nowhere close to the right level. I wish my mails were not deleted after a month as I did a full comparison in my old council thread for what we were up against, when we thought that we were going to be up against more of a challenge.