DeletedUser492
Guest
With the introduction of the single recruitment queue, What effects, possitive and negative do you think it'll have on the start-up phase of the world?.
i think that for the D build, people will favour the sp/sw/(arch?) over the sp/hc build
I've come to this conclusion due to not being able to simultaneously recruiting infantry and mounted, if we also factor in the high lv of the rax needed to recruit the hc, going for the sp/hc build would be extreamly risky, by way of as damn near building your quota of sp and only sp before being able to build the hc thus leaving you in a very precarious position when faced against an opponent who is ax heavy.
How will this affect the pure O builders?
If the sp/sw/(arch?) route is favoured the O builders will need to factor this when determining the ax/lc/(ma?) build of there initial nuke. with the standard 6k/3k/(150?) start-up nuke(assuming full builds!!) being used the attacker will obvs be facing a firmer defence, and looking at the wall stats(if i have this correct) the wall now gives a much larger defence bonus to the defenders. With this taken ito account the attacker will need to be more selective on their initial target and will need to employ the tribes help to gain a tactial advantage thus promoting tribal working relations.
Probably the most important point is the vastly reduced build speed advantage the attacker once had. This alone imo is a game changer resulting in the promotion of teamwork and very carefull planning, in essesence it has leveled the field between D and O which may result in a much longer start-up phase (although this can be somewhat negated by the ptw crowns system).
i think that for the D build, people will favour the sp/sw/(arch?) over the sp/hc build
I've come to this conclusion due to not being able to simultaneously recruiting infantry and mounted, if we also factor in the high lv of the rax needed to recruit the hc, going for the sp/hc build would be extreamly risky, by way of as damn near building your quota of sp and only sp before being able to build the hc thus leaving you in a very precarious position when faced against an opponent who is ax heavy.
How will this affect the pure O builders?
If the sp/sw/(arch?) route is favoured the O builders will need to factor this when determining the ax/lc/(ma?) build of there initial nuke. with the standard 6k/3k/(150?) start-up nuke(assuming full builds!!) being used the attacker will obvs be facing a firmer defence, and looking at the wall stats(if i have this correct) the wall now gives a much larger defence bonus to the defenders. With this taken ito account the attacker will need to be more selective on their initial target and will need to employ the tribes help to gain a tactial advantage thus promoting tribal working relations.
Probably the most important point is the vastly reduced build speed advantage the attacker once had. This alone imo is a game changer resulting in the promotion of teamwork and very carefull planning, in essesence it has leveled the field between D and O which may result in a much longer start-up phase (although this can be somewhat negated by the ptw crowns system).
