• Hello, Guest!
    Are you passionate about Tribal Wars 2 and like to help your fellow players?
    We currently have open positions for Forum Moderators!

    >> Join the Tribal Wars 2 Team now! <<
    We would love to hear from you!

General discussion Juliusburg [EN114]

pulpo

pulpo

Community Manager
Tribal Wars 2 Team
Dear players,

This thread was created with the special purpose of promoting a healthy discussion space regarding general matters of the Juliusburg realm. In this line, please bear in mind our forum rules when you post your comments.

Have great discussions!
Your Tribal Wars 2 Team
 
I see what you did there, but let’s keep it respectful in this thread, as stated in the original post. We’re here for healthy discussions, not off-topic jokes. Thanks for understanding! ;)
 
Hi

I’m the founder of Domination on W114.

I’m asking whether you would reconsider the victory point end condition for this world and reduce it to something more proportionate to our tribe’s size.

The current win condition is 1200 victory points. We have 22 members, which effectively requires each player to reach around 54 points. That level feels excessive given the size and current state of the world.

I want to be clear that simply recruiting more players to inflate total points is not a meaningful solution. It undermines the competitive integrity of the world and turns it into a numbers exercise rather than strategy.

There are a few factors that make the current requirement unrealistic:

* The map size relative to active players
* The number of other active worlds drawing player attention
* The clear dominance of the leading tribe
* The lack of any realistic comeback potential for remaining opponents

At this stage, the world is effectively decided. The players who could compete have already quit, and no new players are joining to create meaningful resistance—especially with newer worlds available.

As a result, progression has stalled into repetitive nobling of barbarian villages purely to meet an inflated requirement. While I understand the intent behind having a defined win condition and encouraging world closure, this particular case feels like an outlier where the system no longer serves its purpose.

I also noticed that the victory point requirement was reduced from 1200 to 1000 between W114 and W115, which suggests this is already being reviewed and adjusted.

Given the current state of W114, it would make sense to apply a similar adjustment here so the world can conclude in a way that reflects actual strategic gameplay rather than a mindless grind.

Thanks,

Holdtight
 
Hello hogesas,

Thank you for your detailed feedback.

W114 has been running for some time now and has progressed to a stage with more than 5000 villages in play. The current victory point requirement of 1200 is considered achievable within the context of this world’s progression and activity level.

While adjustments may be made between different worlds based on various factors, these are applied to specific worlds and if only it is clearly mentioned in their announcement. For this reason, no changes to the victory conditions on W114 are planned.

We appreciate you taking the time to share your perspective.

Have a nice day.

Kind regards,

pulpo
Community Manager
EN Forum | Facebook Group
 
tiny pp is fine but logic and reasoning should not be clouded because of this

Just seems like the absolute worst way to close out a world - go mindlessly noble barbarians for 2 months guys! have fun

WHAT

Or is the answer to recruit the rest of the world and hug it out :)

come join my tribe, you useless players who don't deserve to be here, so that we can meet a rudimentary and trivial number which doesn't actually correlate to the real outcome of the world

Your point system is clearly calculated on the fact that most the animals that play this game end up merging together and finishing the world with 40 plus members

but when good players come along and wipe the world, and are no longer limited by previous resource constraints due to packs. tribes should have fewer members not more.

idk just some common sense here. you want us to noble barbs for 2 months like man, we will lose to inactivity haha

petition to bring back legolas holy
 
Thank you for sharing part of our conversation with the Community. In the interest of full transparency, I would like to complete the picture, as it appears a portion of the exchange was accidentally left out.

Following my reply, the player responded with the following: "No problem, we will keep the world open indefinitely then as protest."

We simply wanted to make sure the full picture was available for anyone reading this thread. Disagreeing with a decision is completely understandable. Threatening to keep a world running indefinitely because things did not go your way is a different matter entirely.
We will leave it to the Community to judge how mature and constructive that is, especially coming from someone whose original request was framed around competitive integrity and the wellbeing of the world.

Have a wonderful day!
 
Ahhhh so you're bluffing - you don't want us to keep the world open

You shouldn't have let me know that

Let's see W114 go on for a few years

W105 protest still going strong

Be the change you wish to see in the W............... 114 :cool:

Where's legolas when you need him at least that guy wasn't a furry
 
Your intention to keep en114 open has been noted and is clear to everyone following this thread. You have made that point across multiple posts on April 30th, May 3rd, and May 4th, and we can assure you that it has not gone unnoticed. There is really no need to keep repeating yourself.

We wish you a wonderful rest of your day!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top