Does this break the rules

[DeletedUser3635]

Question:- if a Moderator could please clarify the situation.

One of my tribe members plans to let his real life friend be his coop, but he wants his friend a very small player 50 pts, to use the 450 of his crowns to buy boost and other items on his [the larger player] account.

Is this permitted or would it be considered a pushing of the larger account by the smaller account, I would be grateful if you could please give us guidance that this action is permitted.

Thank you in advance for any assistance.

 

[DeletedUser3903]

ManiacRedFox active players can be cooped - as per the coop guideline, each player can have one account per world. Pushing is playing an inactive account as your own. If you or this player has questions regarding this further you are welcome to send in a ticket to support.

 

[DeletedUser1914]

loop holes for days

 

[DeletedUser2847]

ManiacRedFox active players can be cooped - as per the coop guideline, each player can have one account per world. Pushing is playing an inactive account as your own. If you or this player has questions regarding this further you are welcome to send in a ticket to support.

When you read the rules about pushing. it seems like its depending on how the 50p account will be played. Its obvisly against the rules if the 50p account not being played and grown as an real account. If the 50p account is created just to have the possibility to coop the other account this is illegal. Cant see how you can say somethingg else when you read the rules

 

[DeletedUser1914]

When you read the rules about pushing. it seems like its depending on how the 50p account will be played. Its obvisly against the rules if the 50p account not being played and grown as an real account. If the 50p account is created just to have the possibility to coop the other account this is illegal. Cant see how you can say somethingg else when you read the rules

they could simply claim the 50pt is a bashing friend.Thus making it legal by giving it a purpose that isnt directly pushing a sole account..Its complete bullshit but its explainable.Especially if they build it up the slightest so it can hold some troops.

 

[DeletedUser2847]

But a 100% bash account not being grown is also against the rules because its solely existing only to progress others

 

[DeletedUser1914]

But a 100% bash account not being grown is also against the rules because its solely existing only to progress others

the rules relate around the account not growing .If they build a building once a week its deemed to be working towards something.As such its not technically classed as illegal or a 100% bashing account...despite that being the absolute truth.But....loopholes ftw